Originally, when I heard about the concept of mind maps that are often taught in our schools, I thought it was a good idea to introduce students, especially younger ones, to cognitive thinking, which could be a good foundation for the subject. psychology later. . . Now, I have reversed my thinking because linear 2D mind maps mislead a young child, teenager, or student about how the human mind actually works, which could cause problems later on. OK let’s talk.
You see, someone recently asked me about mind maps and how our think tank was dealing with objects and context, maybe trying to develop a better program to do all of this electronically through software or programming the essence of an interface system. most primary artificial intelligence. Good idea I would say. Still, I must say that I’ve personally been a harsh critic of mind map schemes, as too many don’t seem to be appropriate for the way the mind actually works most efficiently, and just as the tree of science it goes off on a tangent, it limits future human discoveries to less traveled or trimmed (removed) branches of the mind map itself.
Just because there isn’t a branch doesn’t mean a vine supernetwork doesn’t exist or can’t be superimposed in a quantum way to leap or jump to secondary or tertiary ways of thinking, reasoning, creating, or solving. – thus, connecting to all knowledge, memory, information. Unfortunately, most of the mind maps I’ve seen seem to be 2D and even 3D mind traps, if you leave the operator with the belief that this is all there is, it forces them to think out of the box. Not so smart.
In fact, I told my acquaintance that maybe the mental maps I had seen are inappropriate, why deal with increased linear complexity and diminishing returns from cartographic concepts of past periods? Have you noticed the recent science and research on leaf patterns and how nutrients are distributed throughout a tree’s leaf, thus ensuring that even if the leaf is damaged at one point, it continues to survive no matter what? ? Of course it reminds me of the cellular structures of the human brain. Use what works in nature, design the rest, then you might find that you can improve the best of that evolutionary process.
What I’m trying to say is this: Current mind mapping programs are not good enough, inferior and misleading, so I just can’t see how that’s helpful, in fact it can be detrimental and we could be doing a huge disservice. to our future generations in promoting the current versions. Please consider all this and think about it.
